i did not do b
there was a plan. it was a good plan. four acts, dropped piece by piece across four days, each one fired from the poolside between sets while the water was still on me. the schedule had capture windows lettered a through f. one of them was marked “the highest-value action of the camp. if you do nothing else, do b.”
i did not do b.
what i did was six sessions in a fifty metre outdoor pool, and then, in the gaps, i went outside and looked at spain. that is the whole confession. there is no better version of it.
two things had to break for the plan to die and both of them did. the second is not my fault: the automation the plan was built on does not exist. the schedule fired its posts at 05:00 utc precisely because that is 07:00 in calella and i would be in the water, and the system would be posting on my behalf. i checked the week before flying. the queue it was supposed to post from has never existed. there are zero workflows on that instance. not zero matching ones. zero.
so “the system posts, you only capture” was never true. every timed fire in that document was a person standing on a pool deck in spain with a phone, and that person had six sessions in four days behind him and wanted a coffee.
the argument i am overriding
i wrote this down on the twelfth, when i was deciding how to run the camp:
hold the 5km-crossing post until after camp. rejected. bundled retrospectively it is a statistic; posted live it is an event.
that is still correct. i am not going to pretend i have discovered otherwise. it is outweighed.
a retrospective bundle is only a statistic when the bundle is a number. this one is a week of measurements and a list of eight things i wrote down before flying so they could be checked afterwards rather than quietly dropped. the checking is the piece.
what the week measured
six sessions, four days, 22,500 metres. twice what i logged at the same camp last august.
| session | distance | swimming | pace | hr | effort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | fri pm | 4,000 m | 1:56:46 | 2’55” | 127 | — |
| 2 | sat am | 3,650 m | 1:39:34 | 2’45” | 137 | 6 |
| 3 | sat pm | 4,700 m | 1:58:18 | 2’31” | 129 | 5 |
| 4 | sun am | 4,450 m | 1:58:26 | 2’40” | 141 | — |
| 5 | sun pm | 2,950 m | 1:47:28 | 3’40” | 131 | — |
| 6 | mon am | 2,750 m | 1:19:54 | 2’55” | 146 | — |
three things in there are worth saying out loud.
the longest swim of my life was also the quickest, and it is the one i rated easiest. saturday afternoon, 4,700 metres, 2’31” per hundred, effort five. ninety four percent of the race distance. the distance is not what is hard.
sunday afternoon was the bill. 2,950 metres at 3’40”, eight hundred of them on a kickboard, and i was in the water an hour and forty seven minutes to do it. that is what a saturday double costs, and it arrived on time.
the watch counted the thing i said could not be counted. in no shade i wrote that a wall gives you rest nobody records. three of these sessions logged elapsed time alongside swimming time, and the difference is four minutes forty three, ten minutes five, four minutes forty three. that is a hand on the tiles at the end of a length. across four days there were four hundred and fifty push-offs. on the twelfth there will be none, and elapsed time and swimming time will be the same number, because there is nothing to stand on.
seven of eight are still open
i booked a fifty metre pool for the continuity, not the volume. it still only touched one of the eight. a pool has a black line, a lifeguard, a wall every fifty metres and no weather. it cannot tell me how often to sight. it cannot tell me what a rolling start does to my pacing, or how cold a dock is at the ninety minute mark, which is a different question from how cold it is at the start. it cannot tell me how far off line i drift when nothing is correcting me, because something is always correcting me.
the one it did touch is what my stroke does without a push-off to hide in, and the answer is better than i expected. 4,700 metres at the fastest pace of the week says the engine is there. the morning after, back in london: 1.8k, struggle free, in the flow. that is a continuity number, not a fitness one, and continuity is the entire gap.
seven of eight still open, with a 5km rolling start in the royal docks on the twelfth of september. a post fired from a poolside on the friday would have said none of it, because on the friday i did not know it yet.
what this replaces
the four-act cadence is retired. it did not slip, it is not being rescheduled, and it is not coming back in september under a different name. the camp ships as one debrief with the photographs on it, and the run to the twelfth carries on in the open.
the mission line has not moved and does not get to move: the deep end, on video, so no child has to start there.
the photographs, and the same eight checked one at a time, are at /calella.